iPod Touch firmware 1.1.3 declared a waste of time
January 18, 2008 on 10:11 pm | In Gadgetry | 2 CommentsThe latest iPod Touch firmware was released after MacWorld, along with an update to iTunes, so I upgraded both the other day. iTunes first: a hefty 64Mb if memory serves, which required a reboot of the laptop after installation. Then I plugged in the Touch, and iTunes notified me of the 1.1.3 firmware update. 165Mb? Jeez! What do they put in these things, that’s obscene. Maybe they forgot to compress it or something.
Anyway, after a couple of hours the update had downloaded, and I watched anxiously while the iPod rebooted itself. Luckily, all seemed to go well, and I was left looking at the new home screen… which looks pretty much the same as the old one to be honest. The dock area at the bottom now has a different background, and some of the icons have been swapped around (I’m pretty certain YouTube was second on the first row before the update). And er, that’s pretty much it. When watching videos, you can now access a ‘Chapter Stops’ screen to jump directly to a particular chapter without having to scan through them sequentially or use the scrubber. I can’t see any other visible changes, and none of the bugs I mentioned previously have been fixed (albums with same name glitch; compilation artists showing up in main artists list). Also, you still can’t select a 12-hour clock if you use the London time zone.
So all in all 1.1.3 is basically a waste of time for those of us not prepared to fork out the $20 (£13) for those five applets that iPhone users already have and that should have been in the Touch from the beginning. Thanks Apple, but no thanks. Of course, they’re under no obligation to provide the applets for free, but c’mon, this is basically the same code that’s already been written for the iPhone and given away gratis. I think it says it all that the ability to view lyrics is part of the paid January Software Upgrade rather than being part of the firmware update. Miserable b’stards.
But the most annoying part of all this? Every single time I connect my iPod Touch to the computer now, iTunes displays that damn page about the January Software Upgrade, and there doesn’t seem to be a way of stopping it from doing so. Sure, you can click the ‘Bug Me Later’ button, but that’s only a temporary solution. Stop forcing this update down my throat Apple: I’m just trying to sync my iPod, for crying out loud.
Apple iPod Touch: it’s a love-hate* thing
January 12, 2008 on 10:15 pm | In Gadgetry | Comments OffThis year**, I received an iPod Touch as my main Christmas gift (16GB version, natch). Given that the thing is so damn expensive it was a three-way split between Paula, my folks and me, and hence not a surprise because I paid for some of it!
First impressions are very favourable. The device is reasonably thin (around 8mm), and extremely well built, as you’d expect from Apple. There are only two buttons: the on/off switch on the top edge, and the round ‘home’ button at the bottom of the fascia. Initially I had trouble figuring out how to turn the damn thing off though. Turns out you have to hold down the on/off switch for a bit, then a slider appears on-screen which you have to, er, slide to turn the iPod off.
The screen, as you probably know, responds to touch (hence the minimalist controls compared to standard iPods). In a word: it’s gorgeous (hang on, that’s two words). Bright, with vibrant colours, it’s superb for viewing photos and especially videos. Definitely a fingerprint magnet though.
However, the major triumph (as far as I’m concerned) is the Touch’s user interface, which is both easy to understand and a joy to use. It also looks fantastic: text is easy to read, even at small sizes, and there are graphical flourishes everywhere that bring a smile to your face (then again, I’m a sad geek when it comes to UIs). The on-screen keyboard that appears during text entry is a tad on the small side, but only those with the chubbiest digits would really have any major trouble with it: the rest of us just need to type a bit slower, and avoid using our thumbs!
I do have a few quibbles though. The Touch automatically locks itself and switches off the screen after a certain period of time: this delay is configurable in the UI, but obviously the longer the delay the more you’ll eat into the battery life. I don’t have an issue with this locking per se, however as there are no external buttons for controlling the volume, pausing or changing tracks, this has to be done using the relevant on-screen controls. What’s not immediately obvious is that you can double-tap the home button to overlay volume and transport controls on the current screen, and this works even when the Touch is locked so at least you don’t have to ’slide to unlock’ first. Regardless, it’s still not as convenient as hardware controls (you have to be able to see the screen for one thing), and I’m sure Apple will fix it in future hardware revisions (after all, even the iPhone has a volume control button).
My other issues are with the firmware, and are much more annoying. First, browsing albums doesn’t work properly if several albums share the same name, even if those albums are by different artists. Think “Greatest Hits” albums, for example. The net effect is that only one of the albums will appear in coverflow, but this one album will include tracks from the other albums having the same name. So if your iTunes library contained “Greatest Hits” by Queen and “Greatest Hits” by the Bangles (yeah, okay, stop sniggering at the back), then only the Queen album would appear in coverflow: tap it, and the track listing would show all of the Bangles “Greatest Hits” tracks as well as the Queen ones. This bug (and I do consider it a bug) also affects iTunes, but can be worked-around to some extent by using the album sort tags. Unfortunately, these tags seem to be ignored on the Touch, hence the only practical solution is to rename the album itself so that it is then unique. At the moment I’m adding the artist name to the end of the album title, like so: “Greatest Hits [Queen]“. Very clumsy.
My second gripe concerns compilation albums (why does so much hardware and software have trouble dealing with these?). In iTunes, you can tag a track as belonging to a compilation album. When viewing a list of artists on the iPod, those who have only contributed to compilation albums are not supposed to appear in the list, thus stopping those ‘one-hit wonders’ from cluttering things up. However, on the Touch this feature is broken, and the artists list contains everybody. I mean, I’ve got Acker Bilk in my artists list for crying out loud, just because he performed one poxy track on an ‘oldies’ compilation. Again, I consider it a bug because the other iPod models (eg. the latest Classic and Nano) don’t do this. As a workaround, I’m using the ’sort artist’ tag in iTunes to group all such artists together at the end of the artists list on the iPod: still in the list unfortunately, but at least they’re not interspersed with everyone else.
There are rumours of an iPod Touch firmware upgrade being released to coincide with Macworld Expo next week, and I sincerely hope these two issues get sorted. Okay, they’re minor issues in the grand scheme of things, and it seems a little churlish to complain about them when the rest of the device is so fantastic, but hey, there’s always room for improvement, right?
* maybe ‘hate’ is too strong a word, but “it’s a love-minor quibbles thing” doesn’t have the same ring to it
** well, technically it’s last year now
The Sonos experience
August 15, 2007 on 9:15 pm | In Gadgetry | 2 CommentsI’ve been lusting after a Sonos system for around a year-and-a-half now, ever since reading a review of the kit in PC Pro magazine.
For the uninitiated, Sonos (or the Sonos Digital Music System, to give it its full title) is a set of components that let you stream digital audio around your home. There are basically two bits of hardware: ZonePlayers, that actually play the music through an attached amplifier or pair of speakers; and Controllers, paperback-sized bricks with a scroll wheel and colour LCD screen that are used to choose what the ZonePlayers should be playing. The Controllers are supposedly optional, in that each ZonePlayer comes with software you can install on a PC or Mac that will replicate the functionality of the Controller, thus allowing you to control the ZonePlayers via your computer. In reality, one of the main attractions of the system is in using the hardware Controller to browse through and play your music collection. I doubt many people end-up buying a system without a Controller.
Up to 32 ZonePlayers can be ‘connected’ to each other via wired or wireless ethernet, and then controlled via a single Controller. Each ZonePlayer (referred to as a ‘zone’) can play a different track, or individual zones can be linked such that they play the same track. So you could have two ZonePlayers, one in the lounge and the other in the bedroom for example, both playing the same song, in perfect sync with each other.
Splurged: PSP
August 14, 2006 on 4:06 pm | In Gadgetry, Gaming | Comments OffI bought a PlayStation Portable a couple of weeks ago. This was the first serious “splurge” since we bought the laptop computer last year, so I don’t feel too bad (splurging on house stuff obviously doesn’t count, because it’s more of a necessity than a luxury).
We ended-up buying the Giga Pack from HMV: black PSP, 1GB Memory Stick, in-ear headphones with remote control, plus two games, Daxter and Loco Roco, all for just over 200 notes. I also got Wipeout Pure as well, not wanting to break with tradition (I bought the original Wipeout when I got my first PlayStation, then Wipeout Fusion when the PS2 came out).
Initial impressions of the console are positive. The design of the unit is very sleek, as you would expect from Sony. The standard navigational UI (used to change settings, launch games, etc) is simple but looks sexy, and the LCD screen is fantastic. Battery life could be better, lasting around three hours before needing a recharge, but overall it’s a great little package.
And what of the games? I’d heard good things about Loco Roco, and it doesn’t disappoint, being a very original puzzler/platformer. I can’t get Paula to stop playing it! Wipeout Pure reminds me of the 2097 version (the best), which was apparently one of the game’s design goals. I’m having a little trouble with the difficulty level, although that’s probably due to my general rustiness with the old D-pad. As for Daxter, HMV didn’t have any in-stock at the time, so that’s still on back-order.
I haven’t watched any UMD movies yet, and to be honest I don’t think I’ll bother buying any. I just don’t see the point of watching a two-hour film on that tiny screen. I’ve also yet to look into viewing photos or playing music on the machine, as I haven’t really had the time. Maybe when work on the house settles down a bit!
Taking the piss?
May 3, 2006 on 1:30 pm | In Gadgetry, Gaming | Comments OffJust read on BBC News that Nintendo’s forthcoming games console, formerly known as Revolution, is officially going to be called Wii (pronounced “we”). Incredibly, this isn’t a wind-up.
I still own a couple of Nintendo consoles (N64 and GameCube), and Paula has a GBA, but I doubt I’ll be buying one of these when it’s released. For starters, it looks a bit naff, and the controller is just plain weird. Admittedly, Nintendo are aiming for a different demographic than either Sony or Microsoft, but it’s hard to see this unit appealing to those that have never bought a console before, especially with that name. After all, what kid in their right mind would let mum and dad buy one for the living room? Can you imagine the kind of stick they’d get from their mates?
Powered by WordPress with Pool theme design by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.
Valid XHTML and CSS. ^Top^